Capability closure is ahead on parity; enhancement remains the principal readiness gap.
The dashboard separates unique capability closure from business-model requirement completion, so leadership can distinguish delivery progress from changes in scope.
Portfolio capability closure
What is complete, and what remains open
Capability status by intent
Closed versus open capability count.
Capability readiness by domain
Original capability-domain view, retained for continuity with the review pack.
Completion by model requirement
Model completion split by parity and enhancement
Count-based completion using completed requirements divided by requirements in scope.
Capability evolution over time
New capabilities by month, with cumulative base
Monthly additions are split by intent; cumulative lines show how the baseline has grown.
2026 scope added by model
Highlights where new scope is changing readiness expectations this year.
Capability base by intent
Current unique capability split.
Open capability work
Open capabilities by squad
Shows the concentration of remaining delivery work.
Open versus closed by intent
The two executive workstreams have very different remaining profiles.
Now, next and later delivery focus
Adoption and commercial platform indicators
Confidence indicators supporting the transition
Core data asset availability
Availability by data product domain.
Systems decommissioning
Progress by system.
From activity to measurable impact
Digital behaviour intelligence model
May segment volume and movement.
Impact chain instrumentation
Measured now versus required for impact reporting.
Decisions required this month
Sources: latest Aha capability extract, 29 May 2026; May 2026 CIL Business Review pack. Visual treatment aligned to the Collinson International brand system.